> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://docs.lpp-minduniverse.org/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://docs.lpp-minduniverse.org/lingua-pactum-protocol-lpp-documentation/14.-appendix/14.1-canonical-architecture-diagrams.md).

# 14.1 Canonical Architecture Diagrams

### A. LPP End-to-End Architecture

```
Human / Institutional Authority
        ↓
Authority Object
+
Human-Authorized Intent
        ↓
Authority–Intent Binding
        ↓
Action Candidate
        ↓
Canonical Intent Commitment
        ↓
Semantic Verification
        ↓
SVNN Evidence — when required
        ↓
LPP Admission Kernel
        ↓
┌──────────┬──────────┬──────────┬──────────┐
│  ADMIT   │   DENY   │  DEFER   │ COLLAPSE │
└──────────┴──────────┴──────────┴──────────┘
        ↓
     ADMIT only
        ↓
Execution Permit
        ↓
Permit Verification
        ↓
Execution Plane
        ↓
External Effect
        ↓
Admission Artifact
```

The canonical governance spine remains:

```
Authority
→ Intent
→ Admissibility
→ Permit
→ Execution
→ Evidence
```

***

### B. Mind Universe Governance Stack

```
Source
  ↓
SourceMind
  ↓
Source Provenance / Input Trust
  ↓
FaithLocked
  ↓
Semantic Integrity
  ↓
Jarvis Governance Kernel
  ↓
TaskChain Engine
  ↓
Task / Responsibility Continuity
  ↓
ActuMind
  ↓
Action Consequence
+
Execution Readiness
  ↓
Action Candidate
  ↓
────────────────────────────────
LPP Layer 0 Boundary
────────────────────────────────
  ↓
Intent Verification
  ↓
Admission Kernel
  ↓
Permit
  ↓
Execution
  ↓
Evidence
```

Canonical ownership:

```
SourceMind
=
Source Governance

FaithLocked
=
Semantic Integrity

Jarvis
=
Task Governance

ActuMind
=
Action Consequence / Readiness

SVNN
=
Verification Evidence

LPP Admission Kernel
=
Constitutional Admissibility
```

***

### C. Authority / Intent / Admission Flow

```
Legitimate Authority Source
        ↓
Authority Object
        │
        │ binds
        ▼
Human-Authorized Intent H
        ↓
Authority–Intent Binding
        ↓
Task / Agent Evolution
        ↓
Canonical Intent Commitment
        ↓
Current Execution Intent
        ↓
Semantic Verification
        ↓
MATCH / CONTESTED /
MISMATCH / UNVERIFIABLE
        ↓
Admission Kernel
```

The two fundamental legitimacy questions remain distinct:

```
Authority Object
=
Who may legitimately authorize,
and under what conditions?
```

```
Human-Authorized Intent
=
What was actually authorized?
```

***

### D. Control Plane / Execution Plane Separation

```
┌──────────────────────────────┐
│         CONTROL PLANE        │
│                              │
│ Identity / Principal State   │
│ Authority Registry           │
│ Scope Registry               │
│ Revocation State             │
│ Policy State                 │
│ Admission Kernel             │
│ Permit Issuer                │
│ Artifact Signer              │
└──────────────┬───────────────┘
               │
               │ Signed Permit
               ▼
        Zero-Trust Boundary
               │
               ▼
┌──────────────────────────────┐
│        EXECUTION PLANE       │
│                              │
│ Agent Runtime                │
│ Intent Builder               │
│ Permit Gate                  │
│ Tool / Function Executor     │
│ External Connectors          │
└──────────────┬───────────────┘
               │
               ▼
         External Effect
```

Canonical boundary:

```
CP
≠
EP
```

and:

```
EP can request.

EP cannot self-authorize.
```

***

### E. Permit Gate

```
Execution Intent
+
Execution Permit
        ↓
Verify Permit Signature
        ↓
Verify Expiry
        ↓
Verify Authority State
        ↓
Verify Intent Binding
        ↓
Verify Scope
        ↓
Verify Policy Binding
        ↓
Verify Nonce / Replay State
        ↓
     All Valid?
     /       \
   No         Yes
   ↓           ↓
BLOCK        EXECUTE
```

The reference enforcement rule is:

> **No valid Permit → no execution through the governed path.**

Permit verification must occur inside the executor path rather than only inside model reasoning.

***

### F. Evidence Plane

```
Admission Decision
        ↓
Execution Permit
        ↓
Execution / Refusal
        ↓
Admission Artifact
        ↓
┌──────────────────────────────┐
│ CP Signature                 │
│ Authority State Commitment   │
│ Scope Commitment             │
│ Intent Commitment            │
│ Policy Commitment            │
│ Permit / Nonce               │
│ Decision / Reason            │
│ Timestamp                    │
│ Execution Result Commitment    │
└──────────────────────────────┘
        ↓
Independent Reconstruction
```

Reference reconstruction:

```
Admission Artifact
→ CP Public Key
→ Policy Snapshot
→ Authority State
→ Scope State
→ Revocation State
→ Execution Result
```

The Evidence Plane therefore answers:

> **Why was this action allowed or refused under the governance state that existed at that time?**