> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://docs.lpp-minduniverse.org/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://docs.lpp-minduniverse.org/lingua-pactum-protocol-lpp-documentation/11.-public-proof-and-validation/11.9-reference-implementation-and-validation-roadmap.md).

# 11.9 Reference Implementation & Validation Roadmap

Two roadmap layers should remain distinct:

1. the original MVP engineering expansion path,
2. the current public research and validation path.

### Original MVP Engineering Lineage

The Admission Kernel MVP Blueprint records the conceptual progression:

**v0.1**\
Current MVP baseline

**v0.2**\
Policy versioning

* immutable registry
* attestation

**v0.3**\
Continuous admissibility

**v0.4**\
Distributed verification

* multi-signer / dual control

**v0.5**\
Hardware enforcement integration

These labels describe engineering lineage.

They are not binding commitments that future public releases must preserve the same version numbering.

***

### Public Proof v2.0 Changes the Roadmap Boundary

Earlier documentation described a future public verifier as a possible expansion of Public Proof.

That milestone has now partially been reached.

Public Proof v2.0 already provides:

> a standalone verifier for the disclosed public evidence package.

However:

> **Public Evidence Verifier ≠ Public Reference Implementation**

The verifier checks disclosed evidence.

It does not execute the complete private Admission Kernel runtime.

***

### Next Validation Stage

The next public progression may include:

**Controlled Public Evidence**\
↓\
**Independent Evidence Recheck**\
↓\
**Independent Source / Runtime Reproduction under Authorized Access**\
↓\
**Public Reference Implementation or Conformance Profile**\
↓\
**Multi-Principal / Heterogeneous Testbeds**\
↓\
**Adversarial Benchmarks**\
↓\
**Higher-Assurance Deployment Validation**

Additional research directions include:

* formal invariant review,
* multi-principal execution,
* heterogeneous agents,
* distributed state consistency,
* long-running revocation,
* adversarial delegation,
* trajectory mutation,
* and conformance testing.