> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://docs.lpp-minduniverse.org/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://docs.lpp-minduniverse.org/lingua-pactum-protocol-lpp-documentation/10.-research-and-publications/10.7-research-dependency-map.md).

# 10.7 Research Dependency Map

The five-paper chain can now be represented as a dependency graph.

#### Paper 1 → Paper 2

Paper 1 establishes:

```
Layer 0 must exist.
```

But it leaves open:

```
How is Layer 0 computed?
```

Paper 2 answers this with the Admission Kernel.

***

#### Paper 2 → Paper 3

Paper 2 establishes:

```
Admit₀(AR, G, Σ)
```

and a general operational model.

It leaves open:

```
Can this architecture be instantiated
inside a real consequential domain?
```

Paper 3 answers this with LPP-FIN.

***

#### Paper 3 → Paper 4

LPP-FIN demonstrates the practical importance of Financial Authority Objects.

This sharpens the general question:

```
What exactly carries legitimate authority
across domains?
```

Paper 4 generalizes the answer through the Authority Object specification.

***

#### Paper 4 → Paper 5

Paper 4 establishes:

```
Valid, scoped, revocable,
machine-verifiable authority.
```

But explicitly leaves unresolved:

```
Does the evolved trajectory
still preserve the meaning
that authority actually authorized?
```

Paper 5 answers with Human Intent H, Semantic Verification, Material Mutation, and Re-Admission.

***

#### Complete Research Dependency

```
PAPER 1
Constitutional Admissibility
Why does Layer 0 exist?
        │
        ▼
PAPER 2
Admission Kernel
How does Layer 0 decide?
        │
        ▼
PAPER 3
LPP-FIN
How does Layer 0 operate
inside a consequential domain?
        │
        ▼
PAPER 4
Authority Objects
What machine-verifiable object
carries legitimate authority?
        │
        ▼
PAPER 5
Latent Intent Mismatch
What happens when authority survives
but authorized meaning does not?
```

The same dependency can be summarized by concept:

```
Legitimacy
        ↓
Decision
        ↓
Application
        ↓
Authority Object
        ↓
Intent Preservation
```

Or by the current protocol spine:

```
Authority
        ↓
Intent
        ↓
Admissibility
        ↓
Permit
        ↓
Execution
        ↓
Evidence
```

The research program does not map one paper to one protocol object mechanically.

Rather, each publication progressively fills a missing part of the complete governance model.

***